Skip to content
Heads & Beds

How robust is the ranking?

Auburn ranks first in 94% of 5,000 random weightings. Madison ranks last in every one.

Seven factors, each scaled against the other two markets. Move the weights to test your own view; the robustness strip shows how the order holds across 5,000 random weightings at once.

Factor weights

Weights rescale to 100%. Set one to zero to drop it.

  • 20%
  • 10%
  • 15%
  • 10%
  • 20%
  • 15%
  • 10%

Auburn ranks first with 98; Madison last with 0

Composite score, 0–100. Each factor is min–max scaled across the three markets. The memo's order holds at these weights.

  • Auburn98
  • Norman81
  • Madison0

Auburn first in 94% of 5,000 random weightings

Share of Dirichlet(1) weight draws that produce each ranking order. Independent of the sliders.

  • Auburn › Norman › Madison93.6%
  • Norman › Auburn › Madison6.4%

What each factor contributes

Raw value, with the 0–100 scaled score beneath. 100 is the best of the three markets on that factor.

FactorWeightAuburnNormanMadison
Stabilized occupancy, Oct-2620%97.2%10095.6%8983.0%0
Occupancy change, 2024 → 202610%−1.7 pts76+1.4 pts100−11.1 pts0
Same-store rent CAGR, 2 yr15%8.9%1004.8%134.2%0
Latest same-store rent growth10%7.2%1006.4%90−0.3%0
Pipeline ÷ operating beds (comp file + external)20%4.8%1009.3%8842.9%0
Enrollment growth15%3.0%1003.0%100−2.0%0
Share of beds below 90% occupied10%8.5%1009.7%9754.7%0
Composite100%98810

Source: LV Collective comp file (occupancy, rent, comp-file pipeline); university enrollment reports and press for enrollment and fall-2028 pipeline. See Method & sources.